For those of you who are unfamiliar with the convention, the > indicates prior writers. For example: SS> This is "SS" writing first FR> This is "FR" writing secondI am the primary writer (the one with no funny marks in front of his words).
To...... ``bright
``bright began to jabberwocky so:
`A#> I hope you're not postponing your next shower till it comes.
Bite me.
`A#> I haven't seen any instances of anybody being punished. Are boys
`A#> being punished when they can't join the girls' summer basketball camp?
Strangely enough, the idea of segregated summer camps (or sports,
for that matter) is rather alien to me, so the thought never
occurred to me. I honestly don't see why one would think otherwise -
especially when we start mentioning the differences in funding
between men and women's sports at all levels.
SS> For a VERY long time there has been a great deal of
SS> inequality - but I cannot see how FURTHER inequality is the
SS> same thing as equality.
`A#> Again, I see nothing in this case that creates any inequality.
Apparently we shall never agree on this. You've gone to great
lengths - including your comment about every month being white
history month - to vindicate a reverse inequality under the name
of equality.
The way I see it, simply settling for a "Black History Month", or
a segregated women's issues class and the like is EXACTLY the same
sort of aspirin that I was talking about in my essay about Littleton.
How do you justify ONLY a month being dedicated to black history?
Or Asian history? Or Native American history? It's all
separational bull - a token offering that in reality simply
increases the perception of "us and them", doing no-one any good
save those bigots who desire such a thing.
While I can easily understand Jessica's point about short-term
counseling for abuse and rape victims, I /cannot/ see how advocating
such an attitude society-wide as any kind of long-term solution
will do anything save further emphasize the differences rather
than the similarities.
Racism - and all forms of bigotry, whether they be about religions,
skin color, gender, sexual preference, social class or ethnicity -
is inherently based on perceived /differences/. Consistently, such
bigotry is only overcome when people are forced to acknowledge the
similarities and learn to understand (as best they are able) the
differences.
It was only when a jock opened up to me about his mentally abusive
father that I finally understood that he had the same confusion,
the same /emotions/ that I did, things that I had never credited
him with prior to learning about our similarities. [1]
And then I couldn't hate him anymore, no matter how much he had
made my life hell for years before.
Understanding - and acceptance of differences - can only come about
through communication. Voluntarily cutting off such an avenue
can only appear as an addition to the problem, not any kind of
real solution.
[1] For the record, my father wasn't abusive. It was the
vulnerability, the desperation, the desire to be accepted that
I empathized with.
|
|
Back to Bought Love is a Salaried Position |
|
|
|